Keep it clean! Or your text may be deleted! Please see our BloggerFinger Rules!
hot topics
What do YOU have to talk about today? Lately the BIGGEST thing it seems to rant about is our U.S. politics or the U.S. Presidential election, the U.S. economy, or the war. So let's start there.
Please make a suggestion if there is another topic you would like us to list, so people can rant-on about that too!
The sky is the limit!
And guess what else!? You have the freedom to be (an) anonyMOUSE here!!
rants on POLITICS
FIAT, GADHAFI & OBAMA TIES - By Scott Wheeler of Newsmax, May 14, 2009
THIS IS A VERY INTERESTING PIECE. More of what our mainstream media (msm) hides as we’re being conned to death. We all know of his millions in illegal foreign campaign money that the msm covers up.
Subject: Gadhafi
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 10:19 AM
By: Scott Wheeler
Whose interest was President Obama serving on March 30,
when he ordered Chrysler to either conclude a merger with Italian
automaker Fiat within 30 days or lose federal bailout funds which would lead to
its immediate demise?
That untimely announcement placed Chrysler in the
untenable position of accepting whatever Fiat offered, literally cutting the
legs out from under the struggling American carmaker's negotiating
platform. Some financial analysts had already determined that what Fiat was
offering was a very bad deal for Chrysler.
“The steal of the century,” Forbes columnist Jerry
Flint wrote of the deal back in January. “Fiat gets Chrysler for next to no
money, and American taxpayers must throw in $7 billion to make it
happen.” By most accounts, Chrysler was in real trouble, but by announcing to the
world that Chrysler had no other alternatives Obama effectively told Fiat
that Chrysler would accept whatever Fiat offered, eliminating
Chrysler's ability to cut a better deal.
Why would Obama undercut a U.S. company, involved in a
heated negotiation, in favor of a foreign company's interest?
Clear answers are not available, but the presence one
very curious shareholder in Fiat raises some interesting questions.
The African nation of Libya owns at least a 2 percent stake in Fiat and thus
makes Moammar Gadhafi, who controls the wealth of Libya, a direct
beneficiary of the deal favoring Fiat.
Does Obama owe Gadhafi?
That is a tough question to answer, but Obama's
record-shattering $700 million presidential fundraising operation and a
revealing speech Gadhafi delivered nearly a year ago, seem to undress
Obama's inexplicable sabotage of Chrysler's negotiating position with Fiat.
Before anyone was suspicious of the sources of
Obama's campaign funds, Gadhafi made a speech that Al Jazeera carried on June
11, 2008, and translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute
(MEMRI).
"All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and
in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his
success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution
campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency."
Is Gadhafi revealing his knowledge of something that no
one else even suspected at the time?
Since Gadhafi's June 2008 speech, other evidence
has surfaced suggesting that Obama raised significant sums from dubious sources
in Gadhafi's neighborhood, including tens of thousands of dollars
the campaign was forced to return once it was revealed the origin of the funds
was in Gaza, the Middle East.
So far there has been very little interest in the
sources of Obama's massive fundraising, and with Democrats in control of both
houses of Congress, it is unlikely that there will be an investigation into what
many believe is the most prolific fundraising abuse ever.
Gadhafi's prescient speech didn't end with his apparent knowledge of Obama's sources of campaign funds though. MEMRI's translation also included Gadhafi's foreknowledge that Obama's campaign
rhetoric about supporting Israel also was just a head fake.
"But we were taken by surprise when our African
Kenyan brother who is an American national, made statements [about Jerusalem]
that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the
Islamic world . . .
"As you know, this is the farce of elections — a
person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him,” Gadhafi
stated in his speech that got no coverage from the mainstream American
media.
Since his election, pro-Israel Americans have been
shocked at how quickly Obama's policies turned hostile toward Israel, such
as the $900 million in aid headed to Gaza after they attacked Israel with
mortars late last year, and forcing Israel to negotiate with Hamas.
With the precision of a campaign insider, Gadhafi also
predicted a recently announced Obama policy regarding Israel nearly a year
ago: "We thought he would say: 'I have decided that if I win, I will
monitor the Dimona nuclear plant, and the other WMD in Israeli's
possession.'”
Last week, a State Department official announced that
the Obama administration would pressure Israel to sign the
nuclear nonproliferation treaty that would allow among other details, Obama to
inspect Israel's nuclear weapons program, something the Israeli's
have kept secret since its inception.
What is most amazing is that the propaganda arm of the
Middle East, the anti-American Al Jazeera network, has proven more
informative about Obama's Middle East policies than the sycophantic American
media.
Scott Wheeler is executive director of The National
Republican Trust PAC (GOPtrust.com), the nation's third-largest
political action committee.
© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Your comments
Just about the only BlabberFinger.com rules are: that you keep the profanity out of your blogs, please.
your blog
BLOGGER FINGER RULES
other cool website links
Scroll down to see all comments
